More
than 400,000 HIV-positive South Africans have begun antiretroviral
treatment (ART) since the government launched its programme in 2004.
But this impressive-sounding figure still only represents one third of
the estimated number of people in need of treatment, and that number is
expanding by an additional half a million people every year.
If
South Africa is to achieve its ambitious goals for expanding treatment
access, as well as the UN Millennium Development Goal of universal
access, the current models for delivering treatment will need an
overhaul.
This was the finding of a study that compared
antiretroviral (ARV) service delivery in three South African provinces:
Western Cape, Gauteng and the Free State.
Helen Schneider, a
researcher with the Centre for Health Policy at the University of
Witwatersrand, noted while presenting the study at the 4th Public
Health Association of South Africa Conference in Cape Town on Tuesday
that despite the existence of national policies and guidelines for ARV
treatment, "implementation is strongly driven by what happens at
provincial and district level."
A comparison of 16 facilities
providing treatment in the three provinces revealed wide variations in
referral systems and staffing levels, but in all three provinces the
researchers found a lack of integration of ARV services with other
health services. Patients frequently had to go to other facilities for
the treatment of TB, or for other opportunistic infections, or for
antenatal care.
The study also found that in many districts
there were too few doctors and pharmacists providing ARV services,
creating service bottlenecks. Systems for monitoring and evaluating
patients on ARV treatment were also generally weak, and the use of data
to improve services even weaker.
"These models won't be
sufficient to achieve universal access," Schneider said. She
recommended a shift towards more integrated ARV services, delivered
primarily by nurses at primary health care clinics.
The
challenge is not only to expand the numbers of people receiving
treatment, but to safeguard the quality of treatment, said Dr David
Pienaar of the University of Cape Town's School of Public Health and
Family Medicine.
"We know there's a need for rapid expansion
of ART in South Africa over the next five years," he told conference
delegates, "but without excellent adherence there's a risk of
individual treatment failure and population-level drug resistance."
Pienaar
and his colleagues had interviewed patients at five ARV clinics in two
districts of the Western Cape to discover what factors determined good
treatment adherence.
They found that a patient's age, gender
and education level had much less to do with whether or not they
consistently took their ARV drugs than the distance they lived from the
facility where they accessed treatment: those living more than 20
minutes away from a treatment site were more likely to report missing
doses.
Patients who had a treatment "buddy", a friend or
relative who reminded them to take their medication every day, were 66
percent more likely to report excellent adherence, while patients
co-infected with TB and HIV were more likely to adhere to both sets of
medication if they could access them at one facility.
Overall,
the study found good levels of adherence, but Pienaar cautioned that
the median length of time patients had been on treatment was only seven
months.
South Africa is still in the "activist-led start-up
phase" of its treatment rollout, he said. The longer-term outcomes of
the programme were less certain, especially considering the study
finding that a patient's adherence dropped by two percent for each
month they were on treatment. "We need to ensure that clinics are
accessible and placed in the areas of greatest need," Pienaar said.
Other
recommendations included encouraging patients to be tested earlier and
to disclose their HIV status; to establish more community-based
adherence support systems, and moving towards greater integration of
HIV and TB services.